Men and women: the differences 25, August 2009Posted by thegulfblog.com in Random.
Tags: Man and women, Saudi, Stupid video
What an embarrassing idiot.
Arab world relations with Israel 24, August 2009Posted by thegulfblog.com in Egypt, The Gulf.
Tags: Arab World, Israel, Israel relations
add a comment
Background: Most of the 22 member nations of the Arab League do not have diplomatic relations with Israel. Egypt was the first Arab state to recognize and establish diplomatic ties with Israel in 1979. In bilateral talks begun at the Madrid Conference, Jordan became the second Arab state to ink an agreement and establish full diplomatic relations in November 1994. In July 2007, the Arab League sent the Egyptian and Jordanian foreign ministers to Israel to present the Arab Peace Initiative on their behalf for the first time.
Arab League Boycott: Though Arab League boycott efforts began before Israel’s founding, the boycott was formalized after the 1948 Arab-Israeli war. In 1951, the Arab League created the Central Boycott Office (CBO), which was responsible for overseeing the boycott. The boycott consists of three components: the primary boycott prohibiting the importation of Israeli goods and services; the secondary boycott banning any individual or company from doing business with companies that operate in Israel; and the tertiary boycott prohibiting any individual or company from doing business with firms on the Arab League blacklist.
The Egyptians, Palestinians and Jordanians withdrew from the boycott after signing agreements with Israel in 1979, 1993 and 1995, respectively. Some countries, like Algeria, do not enforce the boycott. In 1996, the CBO ceased its operations, which it resumed in 2001; however, the CBO’s resolutions are considered largely symbolic.
Bahrain: In 1994, Bahrain dropped the secondary and tertiary components of the Arab League boycott, along with the rest of the GCC. In 2006, Bahrain closed its national Israel Boycott Office as a condition to signing a free-trade agreement with the United States. However, along with Oman and Saudi Arabia, Bahrain sporadically asks U.S. companies for cooperation in enforcing the boycott.
Mauritania: Mauritania never accepted the boycott. Israel and Mauritania signed a mutual-recognition pact in 1995, and set up special interests sections the following year. Mauritania and Israel established full diplomatic relations in 1999, exchanging ambassadors—the third Arab country to do so after Egypt and Jordan. During the fighting in Gaza in January 2009, Mauritania recalled its ambassador and suspended relations with Israel. In March 2009, Israel closed its embassy in Nouakchott after Mauritania expelled the Israeli ambassador and staff.
Morocco: Israel opened a low-level bilateral liaison office in Rabat in 1994 and Morocco opened a similar office in Israel in 1995. Morocco closed Israel’s Rabat office in October 2000 with the start of the second intifada. While official relations were suspended, diplomatic contacts remain in place for commercial relations and tourism. Morocco does not enforce the boycott.
Oman: In 1996, Oman became the first Gulf state to open a trade mission in Israel, but recalled its trade representative after five months, citing a lack of progress in peace talks. In October 2000, Oman suspended relations with Israel, including permanently closing its office in Israel and the Israeli office in Muscat. Oman pledged to abandon the primary element of the boycott as a condition to signing a free-trade agreement with the United States in 2006, but the United States continues to receive requests for cooperation with the boycott.
In 1996, Oman established the Middle East Desalination Research Centre (MEDRC)—governed by an Executive Council that includes representatives from Oman, the U.S., Israel, Japan, South Korea, Jordan, the Palestinian Authority, the Netherlands and Qatar—to meet the water needs of all the parties involved within the context of the Working Group on Water Resources, one of the multilateral tracks that came out of the Madrid conference.
Qatar: Israel and Qatar pledged to open trade offices in their respective countries in 1996.1 Israel opened a trade office in Doha, but Qatar did not reciprocate2, cancelling its planned trade office in July of the same year after Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu rejected3 the concept of land for peace. Also during the Oslo years, Israel sought out a deal to import liquefied natural gas from Qatar. In 1996, Israel concluded negotiations for a regasification plant in Jordan that would bring liquefied natural gas to Jordan and Israel from Qatar by 2001; however, a drop in gas prices combined with diplomatic pressure ended the deal. Qatar claimed to have shuttered Israel’s trade office in 2000, but it quietly continued operations until January 2009 when Qatar suspended relations and asked for the Israeli trade mission to be closed after Operation Cast Lead.
Saudi Arabia: In 1994, Saudi Arabia and the other members of the GCC announced that they would abandon the secondary and tertiary components of the boycott. In 2005, Saudi Arabia was required to abandon the boycott entirely in order to gain entry into the World Trade Organization, however, the country still enforces the primary boycott, and an official delegation attended a meeting at the Central Boycott Office in May 2006.
Tunisia: In October 1994, Israel and Tunisia agreed to exchange low-level economic liaison officers that would work out of the Belgian embassies in the respective countries. The decision followed the GCC resolution that year to end the secondary and tertiary boycott of Israel. In 1996, Tunisia opened an interests office in Tel Aviv. Tunisia closed the office and froze relations with Israel in October 2000. Tunisia does not enforce the boycott.
1“Israeli trade officials in Qatar quietly mark first anniversary,” Sean Evers, Bloomberg, The Jerusalem Post, May 29, 1997
2“Israeli trade officials in Qatar quietly mark first anniversary,” Sean Evers, Bloomberg, The Jerusalem Post, May 29, 1997
3 “Gulf Arabs consider cutting ties with Israel,” Sean Evers, Bloomberg, The Jerusalem Post, July 15, 1996
Criminally lax security at Kuwait International Airport 21, August 2009Posted by thegulfblog.com in Kuwait.
Tags: Airline security, Kuwait, Kuwait airport
If we’re being honest, the Middle East is a region that is not known for being overly safe. From the full scale, relatively recent wars in the Levant and the Gulf, the seemingly endemic and endless insurgency in Iraq to varying degrees of state sanctioned violence, the region has an unfortunate – yet at times warranted – reputation. One might assume, therefore, that states in the Middle East may pay particular attention to, for example, security and airports. From the hijackings of the 1980s to 9/11 and beyond, air travel has had something of a close relationship with terrorism.
Kuwait has, thankfully, been relatively immune to terrorism as a tactic in recent history. Certainly compared to neighbouring Saudi Arabia and, needless to say, Iraq, Kuwait has been significantly safer. Yet this is not for an apparent want of trying. Many will recall the arrests and ensuing fire-fight in 2005 of suspected terrorists in Mubarak Al Kabir. Moreover, as a country hosting large numbers of Western troops in various bases, Kuwait is a target.
Therefore, with the regional context, not to mention simple good practice in today’s security-conscious world, one might expect Kuwait’s International Airport to take security seriously. Yet, as anyone who has flown through Kuwait International in the past few years can no doubt testify, security can be criminally lax at times.
I write this from the departure lounge bound for Dubai. When I went through the first X-Ray on entering the ‘passengers only’ section, the policeman whose job it is to monitor the screens x-raying my hand luggage for explosives, weapons and other prohibited items had his back fully turned to the screen. Unless he is psychic, this security check was utterly meaningless. True, some machines sound an alarm if they detect unusual items, but they can hardly detect all banned items: indeed; that is why that particular policeman has a job there in the first place.
Yet, there is extra security when passengers go through to their gate. This time the policeman in charge of monitoring this screen was standing talking to a friend and having and good chat. His chest, not his eyes, was watching the screen, checking whether I had smuggled something illegal onto the plane. So once more, unless this shurta had special powers, I could have easily smuggled anything onto the plane that I wished.
The key problem is that this is far from an isolated incident. I have noticed this exact behaviour on the last three occasions that I have flown out of Kuwait. Whilst theoretically I could simply have been ‘unlucky’ by witnessing such occurrences, I simply do not believe that for a second. Incidentally, I have never seen such contempt for security by those guarding our security in any of the hundreds of airports that I’ve been to over the years; let alone an airport in the Middle East.
There seems to be a disgraceful and endemic lack of professionalism at the airport. In addition to their criminal lack of security awareness, the police I spoke to – just a few words in polite Arabic – were rude, abrasive and seemingly indignant that I was getting them off their phone.
As much as this is a personal annoyance of mine there are – need it be said – real, serious and grave security risks here. The whole ethos needs to change and quickly. Not only does such a profound lack of professionalism reflect badly on Kuwait but for the simple task of making policemen do their job remotely efficiently, who is to say how many lives could be saved.
Kuwait Times poll on sponsorship reform 12, August 2009Posted by thegulfblog.com in Kuwait.
Tags: Kuwait Times, Kuwait Times poll, Sponsorship reform
add a comment
Kuwait Times Poll
Should the government scrap the sponsorship system?
Not right now
Hat Tip: Victoria
Kuwait tackles Iqama system 12, August 2009Posted by thegulfblog.com in Kuwait, The Gulf.
Tags: Iqama system, Kuwait, Migrant labour laws, Reform labour
add a comment
The Gulf Times reports that the Kuwaiti Government is approaching a breakthrough in reforming its migrant labour laws. The central pillar of these new proposals is an agreement allowing foreign nationals to change jobs after three years of service with or without the consent of their employer or after just one year with mutual consent.
Whilst such a breakthrough may appear to be little to celebrate, Kuwait is currently in the last and worst category of the US State Department’s list of offending countries for migrant labour abuses and real changes are welcome.
Yet despite some in Kuwait hailing this decision as a major breakthrough with the Minister of Social Affairs and Labour saying that this is a “move is a first step towards the total abolition of the sponsorship system and aims to put an end to modern-day slavery,” others are less enthusiastic. Some, somewhat incredulously, even have the temerity to call for its ‘careful implementation’ “to ensure that the employers’ rights are not abused”.